<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Postmodern Gentleman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://postmoderngentleman.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://postmoderngentleman.com</link>
	<description>Where style lives but not where it comes from.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:43:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Many Ties by Master David Goodmen</title>
		<link>http://postmoderngentleman.com/on-the-street/many-ties/comment-page-1/#comment-1100</link>
		<dc:creator>Master David Goodmen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postmoderngentleman.com/?p=67#comment-1100</guid>
		<description>Neck ties are definitely ugly.  Chain mail/maille is as expensive as ties are ugly.  
I avoid having to consider these items, because My beard is very good.  Why pay to look bad, when one can look good for free?  

My slave has a chain locked around its neck.  This serves the same purpose as a neck-tie---to proclaim the wearer is owned property.  
Also, while a slave collar generally goes equally well---or less well---with most any clothing, the same cannot be said of neck-ties.  One is always having to choose the least-offensive color, pattern, and shape; and to pay for dry-cleaning.  No neck-tie equals no problem!  

No neck-ties for women, either!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neck ties are definitely ugly.  Chain mail/maille is as expensive as ties are ugly.<br />
I avoid having to consider these items, because My beard is very good.  Why pay to look bad, when one can look good for free?  </p>
<p>My slave has a chain locked around its neck.  This serves the same purpose as a neck-tie&#8212;to proclaim the wearer is owned property.<br />
Also, while a slave collar generally goes equally well&#8212;or less well&#8212;with most any clothing, the same cannot be said of neck-ties.  One is always having to choose the least-offensive color, pattern, and shape; and to pay for dry-cleaning.  No neck-tie equals no problem!  </p>
<p>No neck-ties for women, either!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Riding the It Factor Can Cause Chaffing by Master David Goodmen</title>
		<link>http://postmoderngentleman.com/on-the-street/riding-the-it-factor-can-cause-chaffing/comment-page-1/#comment-1099</link>
		<dc:creator>Master David Goodmen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postmoderngentleman.com/?p=176#comment-1099</guid>
		<description>His beard will be good someday.   OK.  

Those colors, though...  Is there ANYONE who who would go out in public, looking like THAT??  Even the valley girl has more sense than he (ahem!) is showing!  

Just to point out the obvious:  How can one&#039;s hair be blown forward by riding a bicycle?  What about reality, physics, and all that?  

Oh, well.  Stopping in the street like that, he will be run over by some yuppie, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His beard will be good someday.   OK.  </p>
<p>Those colors, though&#8230;  Is there ANYONE who who would go out in public, looking like THAT??  Even the valley girl has more sense than he (ahem!) is showing!  </p>
<p>Just to point out the obvious:  How can one&#8217;s hair be blown forward by riding a bicycle?  What about reality, physics, and all that?  </p>
<p>Oh, well.  Stopping in the street like that, he will be run over by some yuppie, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to use an apostrophe (or, dirty, dirty grammar porn for filthy grammarians) by Gina Valdez</title>
		<link>http://postmoderngentleman.com/on-the-street/how-to-use-an-apostrophe-or-dirty-dirty-grammar-porn-for-filthy-grammarians/comment-page-1/#comment-1098</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina Valdez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postmoderngentleman.com/?p=226#comment-1098</guid>
		<description>Office Tramp is impatiently awaiting Postmodern Gentleman&#039;s next post. Don&#039;t make a girl wait forever!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Office Tramp is impatiently awaiting Postmodern Gentleman&#8217;s next post. Don&#8217;t make a girl wait forever!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Topshop Opens to Mixed Fanfare by Postmodern Gentleman &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Topshop Opens to Mixed Retractions</title>
		<link>http://postmoderngentleman.com/news/topshop-opens-to-mixed-fanfare/comment-page-1/#comment-1066</link>
		<dc:creator>Postmodern Gentleman &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Topshop Opens to Mixed Retractions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 06:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postmoderngentleman.com/?p=150#comment-1066</guid>
		<description>[...] of my comments were a tad [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of my comments were a tad [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chloë Sevigny for Opening Ceremony aka BORING by Goose</title>
		<link>http://postmoderngentleman.com/news/chloe-sevigny-for-opening-ceremony-aka-boring/comment-page-1/#comment-738</link>
		<dc:creator>Goose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postmoderngentleman.com/?p=120#comment-738</guid>
		<description>PMG for president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PMG for president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Amsterdam 1: Patricia Fields Party and Other Unrelated Activities by New Amsterdam 2: Many Generalizations &#171; Postmodern Gentleman</title>
		<link>http://postmoderngentleman.com/on-the-street/new-amsterdam-1-patricia-fields-party-and-other-unrelated-activities/comment-page-1/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>New Amsterdam 2: Many Generalizations &#171; Postmodern Gentleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 00:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postmoderngentleman.com/?p=96#comment-524</guid>
		<description>[...] EVENING.  So continuing with last week&#8217;s post, I feel I must relate my general impressions of New York&#8217;s style.  Mind you a few [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] EVENING.  So continuing with last week&#8217;s post, I feel I must relate my general impressions of New York&#8217;s style.  Mind you a few [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Letters of Frowning Upon #1 by Ben</title>
		<link>http://postmoderngentleman.com/on-the-street/letters-of-frowning-upon-1/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 07:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postmoderngentleman.com/?p=53#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Sandpiper legs. _Sandpipers!_</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandpiper legs. _Sandpipers!_</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
